index A-ZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZauthorspublicationsexhibitionsDEUTSCH
 
  Leaving something open to evolution... | Jens Asthoff  
   
  Martin Walde's work as performative interaction  
   
terms:

A circular, opaque, and powdery white heap hardly a centimetre high, the work Wormcomplex (1997), a circle of approximately four metres across, lay there unobtrusively. On well-attended days it was initially made out only by the people lining its borders, pressing forward, attracted to that seemingly empty centre, of which the purpose was not quite clear. A decentrally projected, pale-green spot glowing on the white surface replicates the outer circular form on a smaller scale, thus using the simplest of means to suggest an abstract composition. At first glance in fact one could easily have taken this documenta X contribution by Martin Walde to be a dry sculpture without a pedestal, rigorously composed to minimalist standards, and embellished with a chromatic, bodiless counterpoint. Enough cause for irritation remained nonetheless: This reductionist piece seemed too bedraggled for contemporary minimalism, its contours smudgy in places and its interior marked by the fingerprints or even footprints of observers who evidently had no sense of distance. Apparently this type of "encroachment" was not even forbidden. This, however, was not very clear. There was no specific sign, and the supervisory staff reacted inconsistently to such incidents. Ultimately, viewers themselves had to decide on how they wanted to behave around this piece, or how they believed it w as required of them to behave.

 
Wormcomplex p.1, 2, 5  
Tie or Untie p.2, 5–7  
The Key Spirit p.2  
Woobies p.2  
NOFF#1#2#3#4 p. 2, 6, 7  
Handmates p.4, 7  
Jelly Soap p.4  
Clips of Slips p.4, 6  
Der Regen hat eine angenehme Temperatur  
p.4  
Woobie #2 p.5  
NOFF #4 p.5, 6–8  
Enactments p.6  
Loosing Control p.6  
The Thin Red Line p.6, 8  
Can you give me something? p.6 But a simple formal interpretation of the work became outdated at the very latest when one understands its unusual material. The monochrome substance turned out to be a basic foodstuff, namely flour, and it also contained a very special ingredient: Walde had released a few hundred mealworms into it, thus nonchalantly transforming the formally abstract ring-shaped structure into a biotope with circular boundaries. This entirely changed the perception of the work. It was no longer merely an autonomous "aesthetic object", but had an inherent dynamicallowing the formation of a reciprocal, virtually osmotic demarcation of two domains, or more precisely, habitats. The sudden insight into the work's true nature required the viewers to change their perception, and as a consequence triggered very different reactions. Spaces changed, the viewers became observers, or more precisely, participants: On the one hand the larvae in their exposed situation found themselves encircled by the visitor's feet. On the other hand, though, they were confined by no other than their substratum of food. Would they remain in this provisional, demarcated zone or, being "free-ranging", leave the circle and so undermine the controlled scope of both the usual viewer/exhibition situation? What w ould become of the worms in the course of the one hundred day exhibition, would they die off or mutate to bugs, or perhaps to moths?  
The Tea Set p.8  
   
   
   
     
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
authors:  
  Jens Asthoff first page   (continued on next page)follow me to the right next pagelast page